Contact Information
Sector 62, Noida.
Uttar Pradesh, India.
To contact us, visit our social media handles or mail at contact@legaluplaw.com
Articles By This Author
![Constitution](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/cb-1.png)
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain; Constitutional validity of 39th Amendment (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . February 12, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–This case turns out to be a landmark judgment because of many reasons. For the first time, the prime minister (Indira Nehru Gandhi) elections
![hurting religious sentiment](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/12-400x400.png)
What is the law against hurting Religious Sentiments?
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . February 10, 2022
This article talks about Section 295 of the Indian Penal Code which says that any person having the intention of hurting religious sentiments or damaging
![Are drugs legal](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/17-400x400.png)
Are drugs legal in India?
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . February 9, 2022
In this article, the whole scenario concerning the present conditions of drugs in India, as well as their addicts, are enunciated with data. Moreover how
![Cybercrimes in India](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/20-400x400.png)
Cybercrime Laws in India: Types and Remedies.
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . February 8, 2022
Introduction Cybercrime is a sort of crime that occurs in the virtual realm known as “Cyberspace.” The term “cyberspace” refers to a very vast area
![dk basu](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/dk1.png)
DK Basu V. State of West Bengal, 1991 – Arrests and Jails (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . February 2, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–DK Basu versus West Bengal State is an important case that widened the frontiers of the definition of basic rights. This case study addresses a
![case analysis](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/case-brief-2.png)
Mohammad Ajmal Amir Kasab V. State of Maharashtra, 2012 – Terrorist Attack (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . January 30, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–We all remember the vengeance assault on Mumbai City on November 26, 2008, by 10 terrorists from the Pakistani terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba Fidayeen squad.
![Case analysis](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/cb-2.png)
Husainara Khatoon V State of Bihar 1979 – Habeus Corpus (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . January 29, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–A well-known landmark judgement (Husainara Khatoon) interpreted Article 21 broadly and held that a speedy trial is a fundamental right of every citizen. This
![Bachan Singh](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ms2.jpg)
Bachan Singh V. State of Punjab, 1980 – Death Penalty (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . January 28, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–This is a historic case (Bachan Singh) decided by a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court declared significant restrictions on the
![Macchi Singh](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ms1.png)
Macchi Singh & Ors. V. State of Punjab, 1983 – Death Penalty (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . January 27, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–This case involves Macchi Singh and others being accused and found guilty of the murder of 17 people. This case puts forward a question
![Case Analysis](https://legaluplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/mv2.png)
Maneka Gandhi V. Union Of India (UOI) (1978) – Article 21 (Case Brief)
- By Navjyot Birdi
- . January 26, 2022
LegalUp’s Snippy:–The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, which remains as a bulwark of the Right to Personal Liberty guaranteed by Article